Terms-and-Condition Robbery
What banking, as an industry, and the bank, as an
institution, represent on pages of business and finance/management textbooks
are different from what is practically obtainable in Nigeria and probably some
countries in the world. To all customers of banks in Nigeria, every cash
deposited in their accounts is vulnerable to any category of deduction, either
acceptable or otherwise to the account holder. In fact, mysterious or magical
deductions of funds is not a strange thing to more than 99% of bank account
holders in this part of the world.
A screen shoot copy of the email from Access Bank Plc. |
On June 22, 2020, Access Bank Plc. sent an email to me
(please carefully read the underlines areas). Based on the instruction, the
bank has activated a plan to deduct FIFTY NAIRA for all inflows into my account
(this applies to all customers) as long as the amount is more than 10,000 naira
(transferred or paid in cash) but the account needs to be funded so that such
charges could be effected on all transactions from February 1, 2020 to April
30, 2020.
When I read the email, I asked myself some logical
questions. If all fund transfers are not free of charges from all originating
banks, why should the receiving bank charge the customer, as long as the
transfer is within Nigeria? If “stamp duty” actually means “a duty levied on
the legal recognition of a certain document,” is cash payment into a bank account
not different from a document? What is/are the differences between a document
and a transaction? Is the Central Bank of Nigeria so poor that bank customers
must be exploited, squeezed, impoverished and robbed legitimately for the
funding of the apex bank?
If cashless policy remains the anthem of the CBN, as
it has been since the days of Lamido Sanusi Lamido, a former governor of the
institution, why are the banks, particularly Access Bank Plc., empowered to
squeeze cash out of us, especially during this period of no payment of palliative
by the so-called government to the people? If the CBN is not interested in the
pains, sufferings, cries, unemployment, wasting talents, abandoned manpower and
the backward developments, which this so-called “stamp duty” would have on
struggling entrepreneurs in Nigeria, then it would be logical to rename the CBN
as the Central Bank of Bank Owners. Also, the covert methods of fund deduction
should be described as “stealing-by-trick methodology.”
Is it only in
Nigeria that customers must pay for the property that belongs to a bank or electricity
distribution companies? Whether the answer is “yes” or “no,” it should be
known, without argument, that things that are obtainable in this country are
opposites of what banking entails in the European Union or Canada. In such
territories, issuance of ATM card is free. ATM maintenance charge does not exist;
not even a monthly charge, since the machines belong to the banks; not the
customers.
Since the experience in Nigeria is the opposite, the
coalition between the banks and the CBN is now the best platform for renewed
exploitations. With pro-banking and anti-masses policies and pursuits, would it
not be a great idea to suggest new charges with which the CBN and the banks can
impoverishe the palliative-denied people? In my view, monthly staff maintenance charge, weekly fund security charge and bi-annual USSD/Mobile app software upgrading charge would do. Don’t
you think the likes of Herbert Wigwe, Jim Ovia and company would become richer
than Jeff Bezos, Bill Gate, Mark Zuckerberg put together in ten folds within
few months with these suggested charges? Are your thoughts on this issue similar
to mine?
Comments
Post a Comment