Trump and the Hanoi Summit
Politics is a two-sided
coin. To some individuals, it is characterized by fake achievements and loud
media coverage of nothing. And to some, it is the source of inevitable power.
Therefore, its propaganda of success is always preceded by noise or media
publicity. To experienced people in politics, failure to deliver a well-advertised
policy is similar to a billion-dollar advertisement of a product that would
never see the light of the day. Such is similar to pre-elections promises all
over the globe. They usually end in imagination; not reality.
Once, Donald Trump
and the North Korean leader, Kim Jong-un, made so much noise on nuclear weapons
and ammunitions of their countries. In fact, in the media competition for the
most efficient nuclear warhead, Trump affirmed to Kim that his nuclear button
is the bigger one.
Either big or small, are nuclear weapons tools for building
global peace or greater economy? If the answer is in affirmative, how many
nuclear warheads will be required to reverse the value of the Zimbabwean
currency to what it was before 1990 or that of Venezuela? Despite the media coverage
of activities in the White House, especially on Twitter, for months before and
after the inauguration of Trump, the increase in level of poverty and migration
of Africans to Europe through Morocco and Libya has not reduced. So, can anyone
understand the futility of accumulating weapons of war or the claim for
military superiority?
Kim and Trump at the Hanoi Summit |
Weeks before the
Hanoi Summit of February 27 to 28, 2019 in Vietnam with Kim, Donald Trump
publicized his successes ahead with enthusiasm. His celebration before the meeting
in the presence of the media is similar to a soccer player who jubilated a
given penalty before it was taken. But eventually when taken, it was not scored.
In fact, before the
arrival of Trump in Vietnam, he implicitly described Barack Obama and his
predecessor, George Bush, as failures in their foreign policies in putting
North Korea under control. But is North Korea a colony?
Despite the
unresolved circumstances that surround the death of Otto Warmbier (an American
student who was returned to the US after 17-month detention and died few days
after his return to the US in comatose), Mr. Trump praised Kim with words that
characterize him as a trust worthy leader before the meeting in Hanoi. Would the
family of Otto or the CIA say the same?
However, with the
extremely and unexpectedly short period of meeting in Hanoi, it is inarguable
that Kim, within few minutes into the meeting, showed Trump that the People's
Republic of North Korea is not a colony of any so-called super power or an
account on Twitter. And that Donald Trump is not the CEO of the Korean people.
To add more to the
worry of the man who usually sacks his physically appointed officers on
Twitter, his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, has wrapped him up in some
circumstances that could lead to his impeachment or legal proceedings. How he
would be able to stay afloat in the labyrinth of Cohen’s accusation depends on
so many factors – the outcome of Robert Mueller’s investigation which would be
known soon, the findings of US Senate Intelligence Committee, the American
people and the media.
Eventually, Kim got
the only thing he aimed to accomplish at the summit – a handshake. But
what did Trump achieved? Empty authorization of a commando without securing his
much-heralded deal at the Hanoi summit.
How long it will
take the White House, with Trump in it, to “beg” Kim Jong-un is what remains
unknown. But one thing is certain, Kim would not kowtow before Trump; each
party would claim victory as masters according to their beliefs.
Akinlolú-Prime
Samuelo
writing…
Comments
Post a Comment